Skip to main content

Minimum Operations to Equalize Binary String - Video Solutions

HardMathStringBreadth-First SearchUnion FindOrdered Set

Minimum Operations to Equalize Binary String | Brute Force | Optimal | Intuition | Leetcode 3666

codestorywithMIK
1:13:0412,212 views
10 video solutions available

Minimum Operations to Equalize Binary String - Video Solution

Watch 10 video solutions for Minimum Operations to Equalize Binary String, a hard level problem involving Math, String, Breadth-First Search. This walkthrough by codestorywithMIK has 12,212 views views. Want to try solving it yourself? Practice on FleetCode or read the detailed text solution.

Problem Statement

You are given a binary string s, and an integer k.

In one operation, you must choose exactly k different indices and flip each '0' to '1' and each '1' to '0'.

Return the minimum number of operations required to make all characters in the string equal to '1'. If it is not possible, return -1.

 

Example 1:

Input: s = "110", k = 1

Output: 1

Explanation:

  • There is one '0' in s.
  • Since k = 1, we can flip it directly in one operation.

Example 2:

Input: s = "0101", k = 3

Output: 2

Explanation:

One optimal set of operations choosing k = 3 indices in each operation is:

  • Operation 1: Flip indices [0, 1, 3]. s changes from "0101" to "1000".
  • Operation 2: Flip indices [1, 2, 3]. s changes from "1000" to "1111".

Thus, the minimum number of operations is 2.

Example 3:

Input: s = "101", k = 2

Output: -1

Explanation:

Since k = 2 and s has only one '0', it is impossible to flip exactly k indices to make all '1'. Hence, the answer is -1.

 

Constraints:

  • 1 <= s.length <= 10​​​​​​​5
  • s[i] is either '0' or '1'.
  • 1 <= k <= s.length
Read full problem with examples

Approach Overview

Problem Overview: You are given a binary string and must compute the minimum number of operations required to transform it so all positions satisfy the equality condition defined in the problem. Each operation modifies positions in the string, and the challenge is finding the smallest sequence of transformations that leads to a valid equalized state.

Approach 1: Brute Force State Exploration (Exponential Time, O(2^n) time, O(2^n) space)

The most direct strategy treats every possible binary configuration as a state and explores transformations until an equalized string appears. A breadth-first search can generate neighboring states by applying every valid operation. Because the number of binary strings grows exponentially, this approach quickly becomes infeasible for large inputs. It is mainly useful for reasoning about correctness and validating small examples.

Approach 2: Component Grouping with Union Find (O(n α(n)) time, O(n) space)

Many constraints in binary string transformation problems effectively tie multiple indices together. If operations force certain positions to always change together, those indices can be merged into the same component using Union Find. After grouping indices, count how many 0s and 1s appear inside each component and compute the minimum flips required to make the component consistent. This dramatically reduces the state space because decisions are made per component instead of per index.

Approach 3: BFS with Ordered Set (O(n log n) time, O(n) space)

The optimized approach models the problem as a shortest-path search over indices that still violate the equality condition. Use Breadth-First Search to process positions whose value mismatches the required target. An ordered set keeps remaining unresolved indices sorted so you can quickly locate the next reachable positions affected by an operation. Each BFS expansion applies an operation, removes resolved indices from the set, and pushes newly affected positions into the queue. Because every index is inserted and removed at most once and ordered set operations cost O(log n), the total complexity becomes O(n log n).

Recommended for interviews: Interviewers expect the BFS + ordered set formulation. Brute force shows you understand the state-space model, while the optimized solution demonstrates the ability to prune transitions and manage active indices efficiently. The key insight is representing unresolved positions as a searchable structure and expanding them with BFS to guarantee the minimum number of operations.

Complexity Analysis

ApproachTimeSpaceWhen to Use
Brute Force State ExplorationO(2^n)O(2^n)Only for reasoning about small inputs or verifying correctness
Union Find Component GroupingO(n α(n))O(n)When operations link indices into forced groups
BFS + Ordered SetO(n log n)O(n)General optimal solution for large strings with dynamic index updates