Table: Insurance
+-------------+-------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+-------+ | pid | int | | tiv_2015 | float | | tiv_2016 | float | | lat | float | | lon | float | +-------------+-------+ pid is the primary key (column with unique values) for this table. Each row of this table contains information about one policy where: pid is the policyholder's policy ID. tiv_2015 is the total investment value in 2015 and tiv_2016 is the total investment value in 2016. lat is the latitude of the policy holder's city. It's guaranteed that lat is not NULL. lon is the longitude of the policy holder's city. It's guaranteed that lon is not NULL.
Write a solution to report the sum of all total investment values in 2016 tiv_2016, for all policyholders who:
tiv_2015 value as one or more other policyholders, andlat, lon) attribute pairs must be unique).Round tiv_2016 to two decimal places.
The result format is in the following example.
Example 1:
Input: Insurance table: +-----+----------+----------+-----+-----+ | pid | tiv_2015 | tiv_2016 | lat | lon | +-----+----------+----------+-----+-----+ | 1 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 10 | | 2 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | | 3 | 10 | 30 | 20 | 20 | | 4 | 10 | 40 | 40 | 40 | +-----+----------+----------+-----+-----+ Output: +----------+ | tiv_2016 | +----------+ | 45.00 | +----------+ Explanation: The first record in the table, like the last record, meets both of the two criteria. The tiv_2015 value 10 is the same as the third and fourth records, and its location is unique. The second record does not meet any of the two criteria. Its tiv_2015 is not like any other policyholders and its location is the same as the third record, which makes the third record fail, too. So, the result is the sum of tiv_2016 of the first and last record, which is 45.
This approach involves writing a SQL query to filter and compute the sum of all total investment values in 2016 (tiv_2016) for policyholders, ensuring they satisfy the given criteria.
In essence, we utilize SQL's aggregation functions alongside grouping features to systematically filter the data for our specific needs. This is accomplished by creating temporary tables/subqueries to collect and filter specific required datasets.
This SQL solution utilizes subqueries to filter polynomial datasets based on constraints.
tiv_2015 is shared by more than one policyholder using HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT pid) > 1.HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT pid) = 1.tiv_2016 values and rounds it to two decimal places using SQL's ROUND function.Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting in aggregation and grouping.
Space Complexity: O(n) to store intermediate datasets in memory.
This approach involves using in-memory computations through programming languages with efficient data manipulation capabilities. We load the data into memory and use data structures like dictionaries and sets to maintain unique conditions and compute the resultant sum.
Utilize hashmaps to track matching tiv_2015 values and cities uniquely defined by (lat, lon).
This solution involves several parts:
tiv_2015_count keeps track of how many policyholders share the same tiv_2015 value.city_set and unique_cities are used to ensure uniqueness of the city based on the (lat, lon) combination.tiv_2016 value of those eligible policyholders.Time Complexity: O(n) as it involves two traversals over the dataset.
Space Complexity: O(n) due to the additional space required for hashmaps/databases for storing intermediate results.
This approach involves sorting the array and then using two pointers to find pairs that satisfy the condition. Sorting helps to bring potential pairs closer, making it easier to identify valid combinations without unnecessary checks.
This C program sorts an array and uses two pointers: one starting from the beginning and the other from the end. It checks the sum of these two elements and adjusts the pointers based on the result until a pair that sums to the given value is found.
C++
Java
Python
C#
JavaScript
Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting.
Space Complexity: O(1) because sorting is done in-place.
By utilizing a hash table, we can store the elements of the array and check for complements as we traverse the list. This allows us to achieve an O(n) time complexity for finding pairs that sum up to the given value.
This program leverages a hash table to keep track of numbers we've seen so far. For each number, we calculate its complement to achieve the given sum and check if that complement has already been seen.
C++
Java
Python
C#
JavaScript
Time Complexity: O(n), as each insertion and lookup in the hash table is O(1).
Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the hash table values.
| Approach | Complexity |
|---|---|
| Approach 1: SQL Query with Aggregation and Grouping | Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting in aggregation and grouping. Space Complexity: O(n) to store intermediate datasets in memory. |
| Approach 2: Structural Data Handling with In-Memory Computation | Time Complexity: O(n) as it involves two traversals over the dataset. Space Complexity: O(n) due to the additional space required for hashmaps/databases for storing intermediate results. |
| Using Sorting and Two-Pointer Technique | Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting. |
| Using Hash Table for O(n) Complexity | Time Complexity: O(n), as each insertion and lookup in the hash table is O(1). |
LeetCode Medium 585 "Investments in 2016" Twitter Interview SQL Question With Detailed Explanation • Everyday Data Science • 5,823 views views
Watch 9 more video solutions →Practice Investments in 2016 with our built-in code editor and test cases.
Practice on FleetCode