Skip to main content

Rotate Function - Video Solutions

MediumArrayMathDynamic Programming

Rotate Function | Detailed with Proof | Leetcode 396 | codestorywithMIK

codestorywithMIK
25:546,825 views
10 video solutions available

Rotate Function - Video Solution

Watch 10 video solutions for Rotate Function, a medium level problem involving Array, Math, Dynamic Programming. This walkthrough by codestorywithMIK has 6,825 views views. Want to try solving it yourself? Practice on FleetCode or read the detailed text solution.

Problem Statement

You are given an integer array nums of length n.

Assume arrk to be an array obtained by rotating nums by k positions clock-wise. We define the rotation function F on nums as follow:

  • F(k) = 0 * arrk[0] + 1 * arrk[1] + ... + (n - 1) * arrk[n - 1].

Return the maximum value of F(0), F(1), ..., F(n-1).

The test cases are generated so that the answer fits in a 32-bit integer.

 

Example 1:

Input: nums = [4,3,2,6]
Output: 26
Explanation:
F(0) = (0 * 4) + (1 * 3) + (2 * 2) + (3 * 6) = 0 + 3 + 4 + 18 = 25
F(1) = (0 * 6) + (1 * 4) + (2 * 3) + (3 * 2) = 0 + 4 + 6 + 6 = 16
F(2) = (0 * 2) + (1 * 6) + (2 * 4) + (3 * 3) = 0 + 6 + 8 + 9 = 23
F(3) = (0 * 3) + (1 * 2) + (2 * 6) + (3 * 4) = 0 + 2 + 12 + 12 = 26
So the maximum value of F(0), F(1), F(2), F(3) is F(3) = 26.

Example 2:

Input: nums = [100]
Output: 0

 

Constraints:

  • n == nums.length
  • 1 <= n <= 105
  • -100 <= nums[i] <= 100
Read full problem with examples

Approach Overview

Problem Overview: Given an integer array nums, define a rotation function F(k) where the array is rotated k positions and each element is multiplied by its index. The goal is to compute the maximum value among all rotations.

Approach 1: Brute Force Rotation Simulation (Time: O(n^2), Space: O(1))

Directly simulate every rotation and compute the function value from scratch. For each rotation k, iterate through the array and calculate F(k) = sum(i * rotated[i]). Rotating or indexing elements for every k requires scanning the entire array, which results in O(n) work per rotation and n total rotations. The approach is straightforward and useful for validating correctness, but it becomes slow when n grows because the total runtime reaches O(n^2). This method mainly relies on basic array traversal.

Approach 2: Mathematical Recurrence Optimization (Time: O(n), Space: O(1))

The key observation is that consecutive rotation values are related. If F(k) is known, the next rotation can be derived using a recurrence instead of recomputing everything. Let S be the total sum of all elements. After rotating once, each element’s index increases by 1 except the last element which moves to index 0. This leads to the formula F(k) = F(k-1) + S - n * nums[n-k]. Start by computing F(0) and the total sum in one pass. Then iterate through rotations using the recurrence to update the value in constant time. This transforms the problem into a linear scan using ideas from math and recurrence-style reasoning similar to dynamic programming. The algorithm evaluates all rotations in O(n) time while using only constant extra space.

Recommended for interviews: The mathematical recurrence approach is the expected solution. Interviewers often want to see whether you recognize the relationship between consecutive rotations and avoid recomputing the weighted sum each time. Implementing the brute force version first demonstrates understanding of the rotation function, but deriving the recurrence and reducing the complexity to O(n) shows strong problem‑solving skills.

Complexity Analysis

ApproachTimeSpaceWhen to Use
Brute Force Rotation SimulationO(n^2)O(1)Useful for understanding the definition of the rotation function or verifying correctness on small inputs
Mathematical Recurrence OptimizationO(n)O(1)Best choice for interviews and large arrays since each rotation value is derived in constant time