You are given an encoded string s. To decode the string to a tape, the encoded string is read one character at a time and the following steps are taken:
d, the entire current tape is repeatedly written d - 1 more times in total.Given an integer k, return the kth letter (1-indexed) in the decoded string.
Example 1:
Input: s = "leet2code3", k = 10 Output: "o" Explanation: The decoded string is "leetleetcodeleetleetcodeleetleetcode". The 10th letter in the string is "o".
Example 2:
Input: s = "ha22", k = 5 Output: "h" Explanation: The decoded string is "hahahaha". The 5th letter is "h".
Example 3:
Input: s = "a2345678999999999999999", k = 1 Output: "a" Explanation: The decoded string is "a" repeated 8301530446056247680 times. The 1st letter is "a".
Constraints:
2 <= s.length <= 100s consists of lowercase English letters and digits 2 through 9.s starts with a letter.1 <= k <= 109k is less than or equal to the length of the decoded string.263 letters.This approach involves simulating the decoding process in reverse. Instead of constructing the entire decoded string, we keep track of its potential length. The core idea is to process the string in reverse while maintaining the effective length given the repeat operations.
When a digit is encountered, it denotes how many times the current segment should be repeated to match the original decoding logic. Conversely, letters are treated based on their position in this accumulated length.
By working backwards, when the kth character location matches a letter’s position, it indicates we navigated back through the expansions accurately to find the original letter corresponding to the kth position.
The Python implementation computes the length of the decoded string indirectly by iterating over the encoded characters. When digits are encountered, they scale the accumulated size. By reverting the transformations in the reverse iteration, the character’s position (k) is resolved modulo size to back-calculate its source during the construction. If k mod size becomes zero next to a letter, it confirms the correct backward mapping of the kth position corresponds to that letter.
Time Complexity: O(n), where n is the length of the string s, as it requires scanning through the string and possibly rescanning for finding the exact letter.
Space Complexity: O(1), no extra space is used apart from constants.
This alternative approach iteratively simulates the expansion of the tape until the kth position is intelligibly reached. We avoid producing the content itself but calculate how long the tape would be if fully decoded. Upon encountering the kth target, we can infer shortly by aligning tape lengths with character identities. Essentially, this approach is an iterative construct of the maximal state, allowing us to peel back layers in a controlled manner.
In this JavaScript solution, we iteratively scan to expand the tape size as dictated by the input string. Each character’s impact on the tape accumulating length is considered until the target k value can be mapped definitively backward. The deviation to discover a letter when it resolves directly to size multiples (mod k condition) signals those fit criteria.
Time Complexity: O(n), iterates over the encoded string twice.
Space Complexity: O(1), uses constant extra space.
This approach involves calculating the length of the decoded string dynamically and using that information to find the k-th character by backtracking. Instead of generating the complete decoded string, we track the total effective length as we simulate the decoding process.
The function decodeAtIndex calculates the size of the theoretical decoded string without actually creating it. It iterates through the string, calculating this size. As you move backwards, update k using k %= size. If you find a letter where k becomes zero, you’ve found the k-th character.
C++
Java
Python
C#
JavaScript
Time Complexity: O(n), where n is the length of the string, as we iterate through it twice.
Space Complexity: O(1), as only a fixed amount of space is used.
This approach is quite similar to the backtracking approach, but emphasizes deeper understanding by dissecting the string iteratively and understanding the effective final character through targeted calculation at each stage of string development without evaluating unneeded sections.
This variation emphasizes understanding through excitement in code stepping for size calculation and extraction of the effective character to showcase order of operation purpose more through breakdown as encountered at each string interaction.
C++
Java
Python
C#
JavaScript
Time Complexity: O(n). Every character in the string is utilized only once in theory analysis.
Space Complexity: O(1).
| Approach | Complexity |
|---|---|
| Reverse Decoding Simulation | Time Complexity: O(n), where n is the length of the string s, as it requires scanning through the string and possibly rescanning for finding the exact letter. |
| Iterative Length Expansion Simulation | Time Complexity: O(n), iterates over the encoded string twice. |
| Decode Length Backtracking | Time Complexity: O(n), where n is the length of the string, as we iterate through it twice. |
| Iterative Length Calculation | Time Complexity: O(n). Every character in the string is utilized only once in theory analysis. |
Encode and Decode Strings - Leetcode 271 - Python • NeetCode • 333,550 views views
Watch 9 more video solutions →Practice Decoded String at Index with our built-in code editor and test cases.
Practice on FleetCodePractice this problem
Open in Editor