Skip to main content

Minimum Operations to Transform Array into Alternating Prime - Video Solutions

MediumArrayMathTwo PointersBinary SearchSorting

Leetcode 3896 | Minimum Operations to Transform Array into Alternating Prime

CodeWithMeGuys
13:06184 views
3 video solutions available

Minimum Operations to Transform Array into Alternating Prime - Video Solution

Watch 3 video solutions for Minimum Operations to Transform Array into Alternating Prime, a medium level problem involving Array, Math, Two Pointers. This walkthrough by CodeWithMeGuys has 184 views views. Want to try solving it yourself? Practice on FleetCode or read the detailed text solution.

Problem Statement

You are given an integer array nums.

An array is considered alternating prime if:

  • Elements at even indices (0-based) are prime numbers.
  • Elements at odd indices are non-prime numbers.

In one operation, you may increment any element by 1.

Return the minimum number of operations required to transform nums into an alternating prime array.

A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 with only two factors, 1 and itself.

 

Example 1:

Input: nums = [1,2,3,4]

Output: 3

Explanation:

  • The element at index 0 must be prime. Increment nums[0] = 1 to 2, using 1 operation.
  • The element at index 1 must be non-prime. Increment nums[1] = 2 to 4, using 2 operations.
  • The element at index 2 is already prime.
  • The element at index 3 is already non-prime.

Total operations = 1 + 2 = 3.

Example 2:

Input: nums = [5,6,7,8]

Output: 0

Explanation:

  • The elements at indices 0 and 2 are already prime.
  • The elements at indices 1 and 3 are already non-prime.

No operations are needed.

Example 3:

Input: nums = [4,4]

Output: 1

Explanation:

  • The element at index 0 must be prime. Increment nums[0] = 4 to 5, using 1 operation.
  • The element at index 1 is already non-prime.

Total operations = 1.

 

Constraints:

  • 1 <= nums.length <= 105
  • 1 <= nums[i] <= 105
Read full problem with examples

Approach Overview

Problem Overview: You are given an array of integers and must transform it into an alternating pattern involving prime numbers. Each operation modifies an element (typically by incrementing or decrementing its value) so that the final array alternates between prime and non‑prime values. The goal is to minimize the total number of operations.

Approach 1: Brute Force Prime Adjustment (O(n * sqrt(V)) time, O(1) space)

Check both possible alternating patterns: prime at even indices and non‑prime at odd indices, or the reverse. For each element, determine whether it already satisfies the required state (prime or non‑prime). If not, compute the minimum number of increments or decrements required to reach the nearest valid number. Primality is checked using trial division up to sqrt(num). This approach is straightforward and useful for smaller value ranges but becomes slow when many prime checks are required.

Approach 2: Precompute Primes with Sieve (O(V log log V + n) time, O(V) space)

Instead of checking primality repeatedly, precompute all primes up to the maximum value range using the Sieve of Eratosthenes. Store them in a boolean array so prime checks become O(1). Then evaluate both alternating patterns by iterating through the array once and computing the minimal distance to a valid prime or non‑prime value when needed. Precomputation removes the repeated sqrt(V) checks and significantly speeds up the evaluation when the array is large.

Approach 3: Greedy Pattern Evaluation (O(n) time after preprocessing, O(V) space)

After building the prime lookup table, iterate through the array while maintaining the expected state (prime or non‑prime) for the current index. If the element already matches the requirement, move forward. Otherwise compute the nearest valid value and add the adjustment cost. Run this process twice—once assuming index 0 should be prime and once assuming it should be non‑prime—and take the minimum result. The greedy insight is that each position can be optimized independently once the pattern is fixed.

Recommended for interviews: The sieve + greedy evaluation approach. Interviewers expect you to reduce repeated prime checks and reason about evaluating two possible patterns. Mention the brute force method first to show baseline reasoning, then optimize with precomputation. This combines concepts from arrays, math, and number theory.

Complexity Analysis

ApproachTimeSpaceWhen to Use
Brute Force Prime AdjustmentO(n * sqrt(V))O(1)Small input values where repeated prime checks are cheap
Sieve + Pattern SimulationO(V log log V + n)O(V)General case when array size is large and fast prime lookup is needed
Greedy Alternating EvaluationO(n)O(V)Best choice after sieve preprocessing; optimal for interview solutions