The greedy approach involves sorting the intervals by their end times. Then, we iterate through the sorted list and count the number of overlapping intervals to remove. The idea is to always pick the interval with the earliest end time, which leaves more room for the remaining intervals.
Steps:
Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting.
Space Complexity: O(1), excluding the input space for the intervals.
1using System;
2
3public class Solution {
4 public int EraseOverlapIntervals(int[][] intervals) {
5 if (intervals.Length == 0) return 0;
6 Array.Sort(intervals, (a, b) => a[1].CompareTo(b[1]));
7 int count = 0;
8 int end = intervals[0][1];
9 for (int i = 1; i < intervals.Length; i++) {
10 if (intervals[i][0] < end) {
11 count++;
12 } else {
13 end = intervals[i][1];
14 }
15 }
16 return count;
17 }
18}This C# solution makes use of sorting the intervals based on their end, similar to the above approaches. During each iteration, it tracks non-overlapping intervals and counts the ones to be removed otherwise.
This approach utilizes dynamic programming to solve the problem. It is typically less efficient than the greedy method but serves as an illustrative illustration of tackling overlap problems using dp.
Time Complexity: O(n^2) due to nested loops for dp updates.
Space Complexity: O(n) required for the dp array.
1def eraseOverlapIntervals(intervals):
2 intervals.sort(key=lambda x: x[0])
3 n = len(intervals)
4 dp = [1] * n
5 for i in range(n):
6 for j in range(i):
7 if intervals[j][1] <= intervals[i][0]:
8 dp[i] = max(dp[i], dp[j] + 1)
9 max_non_overlapping = max(dp)
10 return n - max_non_overlappingThe Python calculation sorts intervals and applies nested loops to fill a dp array with the maximum number of non-overlapping subsequences possible within the designated comparisons among start and end times.