




Sponsored
Sponsored
This approach utilizes a stack to keep track of the indices of the elements for which we are finding the next greater element. We traverse the array twice (length times two) to account for the circular nature of the array. For each element, we repeatedly pop elements from the stack while the current element is greater than the element represented by the index at the top of the stack. As we pop elements, we update their next greater element in the resulting array. The stack helps ensure that each element is processed efficiently, leading to an O(n) complexity.
Time Complexity: O(n)
Space Complexity: O(n) (due to the stack and result array)
1def nextGreaterElements(nums):
2    n = len(nums)
3    res = [-1] * n
4    stack = []  # This will store indexes
5    for i in range(2 * n):
6        while stack and nums[stack[-1]] < nums[i % n]:
7            res[stack.pop()] = nums[i % n]
8        if i < n:
9            stack.append(i)
10    return resThis Python solution employs a stack to track the indices of elements. It processes each index twice using a modulo operation to simulate the circular nature of the array. It successfully finds the next greater element by leveraging the stack to keep track of indices that need to find a larger subsequent value.
This approach uses two separate traversals to find the next greater element by checking for each element's greater counterpart. We double-iterate through the array copying elements to support cyclic checking. Though simpler conceptually, its efficiency isn't as optimal due to direct comparisons, and it could degrade to an O(n^2) complexity in worst cases. It's educational for understanding direct exhaustive search in circular constructs.
Time Complexity: O(n^2) in the worst case
    public int[] NextGreaterElements(int[] nums) {
        int n = nums.Length;
        int[] res = new int[n];
        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) res[i] = -1;
        for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
            for (int j = 1; j < n; j++) {
                if (nums[i] < nums[(i + j) % n]) {
                    res[i] = nums[(i + j) % n];
                    break;
                }
            }
        }
        return res;
    }
}In this C# solution, two nested for-loops fully handle the circular array while utilizing modulo division to connect across the array's boundary, forming a straightforward but less optimal technique.