Sponsored
Sponsored
This approach involves iterating through the array while maintaining a variable to track the length of the current continuous increasing subsequence. As we encounter each element, we check if it is larger than the previous one to decide if we should continue the current subsequence or start a new one. We also maintain a global maximum to store the maximum length found during our iteration.
Time Complexity: O(n), where n is the number of elements in the array.
Space Complexity: O(1), as we use a constant amount of space.
1#include <stdio.h>
2
3int findLengthOfLCIS(int* nums, int numsSize) {
4 if (numsSize == 0) return 0;
5 int maxLen = 1, currLen = 1;
6
7 for (int i = 1; i < numsSize; i++) {
8 if (nums[i] > nums[i - 1]) {
9 currLen++;
10 if (currLen > maxLen) {
11 maxLen = currLen;
12 }
13 } else {
14 currLen = 1;
15 }
16 }
17 return maxLen;
18}
19
20int main() {
21 int nums[] = {1, 3, 5, 4, 7};
22 int length = sizeof(nums) / sizeof(nums[0]);
23 printf("%d\n", findLengthOfLCIS(nums, length));
24 return 0;
25}
The function findLengthOfLCIS
accepts an array and its size. We initialize maxLen
and currLen
to 1. We iterate through the array, and whenever the current element is greater than the previous one, we increase currLen
. If currLen
exceeds maxLen
, we update maxLen
. When the sequence breaks, we reset currLen
to 1.
The greedy approach leverages a single pass through the array to determine the maximum length of an increasing subsequence. This method is optimal because it immediately processes each element only once, updating the sequence lengths on the fly, and computing the maximum without revisiting any part of the array.
Time Complexity: O(n), where n is the number of elements in the array.
Space Complexity: O(1), as no additional space other than variables is utilized.
1
This solution is implemented in Javascript, showing a loop control alongside index checks that influence updates giving a greedy way to settle the sliding window approach dynamically.