This approach uses dynamic programming to minimize the length of the compressed string after removing up to k characters. We'll iteratively decide for each position in the string whether to remove the character or keep it, and if kept, determine the optimal compression length.
The idea is to use a DP table where dp[i][j] stores the minimal compression length achievable for the substring s[0...i] with j deletions.
Time Complexity: O(n^3). For each starting point, we may need to process every subsequent character and make decisions up to k deletions.
Space Complexity: O(n*k). Space used by the DP table.
1import java.util.Arrays;
2
3public class StringCompression {
4 private static int compressLength(int count) {
5 if (count == 0) return 0;
6 if (count == 1) return 1;
7 if (count < 10) return 2;
8 if (count < 100) return 3;
9 return 4;
10 }
11
12 public static int minLength(String s, int k) {
13 int n = s.length();
14 int[][] dp = new int[n + 1][k + 1];
15 for (int[] row : dp) Arrays.fill(row, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
16 dp[0][0] = 0;
17 for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
18 for (int j = 0; j <= k; j++) {
19 if (dp[i][j] == Integer.MAX_VALUE) continue;
20 int count = 0;
21 for (int l = i; l < n; l++) {
22 if (s.charAt(l) == s.charAt(i)) count++;
23 int needDelete = l - i + 1 - count;
24 if (j + needDelete <= k) {
25 dp[l + 1][j + needDelete] = Math.min(dp[l + 1][j + needDelete], dp[i][j] + compressLength(count));
26 }
27 }
28 }
29 }
30 return Arrays.stream(dp[n]).min().getAsInt();
31 }
32
33 public static void main(String[] args) {
34 String s = "aaabcccd";
35 int k = 2;
36 System.out.println(minLength(s, k));
37 }
38}The Java solution utilizes similar logic to C and C++, with the addition of the Arrays class for initializing the DP table and determining the minimum length efficiently. This solution focuses on iterations over the string to update DP states as needed.
In this greedy approach, we identify segments of identical characters and evaluate them individually, considering their entire group in the adjustments. By counting the length of these segments, we can make informed decisions about deletions that do not depend on the widely traversed DP table, reducing some overhead complexity.
Time Complexity: O(n + m log m) where n is the length of the string and m = 26 (constant time, simplified in this case).
Space Complexity: O(m) for frequency arrays.
1def min_length(s, k):
2 freq = [0] * 26
3 for c in s:
4 freq[ord(c) - ord('a')] += 1
5
6 freq.sort(reverse=True)
7 for i in range(26):
8 if k <= 0:
9 break
10 if freq[i] > 0:
11 delete_count = freq[i] - (1 if freq[i] == 1 else 0)
12 to_delete = min(delete_count, k)
13 freq[i] -= to_delete
14 k -= to_delete
15
16 length = 0
17 for f in freq:
18 if f > 0:
19 length += 1 if f == 1 else 1 + (2 if f < 10 else 3 if f < 100 else 4)
20
21 return length
22
23if __name__ == '__main__':
24 s = "aaabcccd"
25 k = 2
26 print(min_length(s, k))The Python implementation uses an array to gather character frequencies and sorts it in descending order. The frequency list is then manipulated to use the allowed deletions optimally, simplifying subsequent compressed length calculations.